Teacher: Prof. Mohammed Hashas |
E-mail: hashasmohammed@gmail.com |
CFU: 6 Course code: 804002762 Degree: Master’s Degree “Scienze della Storia e del documento” Course delivery modalities: In-presence |
Language: Italian Pre-requisites: General knowledge of global history Attendance: Optional Assessment method: Oral examination |
Period: 2nd term |
Starting day: |
Class hours |
Program: |
The course aims to study the socio-political and intellectual history of the Arab world from the 19th century to the present, with a focus on the contemporary period post-World War II. After a contextualization of the political relations and dynamics of global and Mediterranean history, the first part of the course is devoted to examining the main historical articulations and periodization of the region’s contemporary history. This part studies the continuities and discontinuities of historical, political, social, economic, and intellectual changes in the modern and contemporary period of Arab societies. Prominent themes and peculiar aspects to be studied include: the phase of the so-called “Arab-Islamic Awakening” (the Renaissance or Nahda), the collapse of the Ottoman Empire, colonialism and the creation of modern nation-states, the post-colonial period, the rise of secular Arab nationalism and political Islam, up to the present day after the “Arab Spring” social protests of 2010-2011. These dynamics and issues will be explored through the study of case studies from the different parts of the Arab world – from North Africa, the Middle East, and the Arabian Peninsula. As to the second part of the course, it introduces how intellectuals of prominence in the contemporary Arab world look at their national, regional, international and universalist issues, starting from the issue of modernity, democracy, the rule of law, human rights, women rights, regional politics, geopolitics, to issues of global justice, environment, and global ethics. These issues are dealt with differently by major scholas and thinkers of the Arab world, depending on their critical perspectives, be they conservative, secular, feminist, liberal, socialist, or Third Worldist. |
Text books: |
|
Bibliography: |
|
Educational goals and expected learning outcomes: |
A) Learning Outcomes: Be able to distinguish between the multiple histories and cultures of Arab societies chronologically, geographically, and thematically. B) Knowledge and Understanding: Be able to know the historical roots of major socio-political, economic, and cultural concepts that have influenced Arab societies and communities especially in modern and contemporary times, and how they are now perceived by contemporary Arab citizens, intellectuals, and politicians. C) Applying Knowledge and Understanding: Be able to apply one’s accumulated knowledge of history in comprehending contemporary Arab societies, their similarities and differences. D) Making Judgements: Be able to critically evaluate events and situations regarding past and present issues of Arab societies. E) Communication Skills: Be able to confidently express oneself in oral as well as written forms regarding the major issues pertaining to the history and culture of the Arab plural world. F) Learning Skills: Be able to make use of the various methods of learning that correspond best to one’s major competences, be they through reading, writing, speaking, or/and listening. |
Methods and criteria for verifying the learning: |
The exam assesses the student’s overall preparation, the ability to combine knowledge about each part of the syllabus, the coherence of argumentation, the analytical ability, and the autonomy of judgment. In addition, the student’s command of language and clarity of presentation are also assessed, in adherence with the Dublin descriptors (1. knowledge and understanding; 2. applying knowledge and experience; 3. making judgments; 4. learning skills; 5: communication skills). The final grade will be based 70% on the student’s depth of knowledge and 30% on the student’s ability for expression (written and oral) and independent critical thinking. The exam will be evaluated according to the following criteria: – Failed: significant deficiencies and inaccuracies in the knowledge and the understanding of the subject matter; poor analytical and synthesizing skills, recurrent generalizations, limited critical and judgmental skills; the arguments are exposed inconsistently and with inappropriate language. – 18-20: Knowledge and understanding of topics barely adequate, with occasional generalizations and imperfections possible; sufficient capacity for analysis synthesis and autonomy of judgment, the arguments are frequently exposed in an incoherent manner and with inappropriate/non technical language. – 21-23: Fair knowledge and understanding of the subject; proper analysis and synthesis skills with coherent, logical argumentation, but with language that is often inappropriate/non technical. – 24-26: Moderate knowledge and understanding of the subjects; good analytical and synthesis skills with arguments expressed rigorously but with language that is not always appropriate/technical. – 27-29: Comprehensive knowledge and understanding of the subjects; remarkable analytical and synthesis skills. Good autonomy of judgment. Topics expounded rigorously and with appropriate/technical language. – 30-30L: Excellent level of in-depth knowledge and understanding of the subjects. Excellent skills in analysis, synthesis, and independent judgment. Arguments are expressed in an original way and with appropriate technical language. |
Teaching methods: |
The course, which adopts an interactive approach. Each class session starts with questions related to the topic of the week, then the professor’s lecture, followed by class discussions, and ends with revisions. The course highly stimulates students’ active participation to enhance their critical learning methodologies through the following activities:
|
Attendance modalities: |
The course is based on an interactive approach, which means that a lot of learning happens through class discussions; the students’ immersion in the material discussed, besides the used digital means of teaching enhance critical understanding and allow the development of sharing the acquired knowledge. This makes attendance highly recommended. |
Previous year | Following year |